[Proposal] Add an optional Disclaimer section for tools with high potential for harm

[FazleArefin]

Several CLI tools can cause serious unintended damage, disruption, or legal issues when misused (even if the user intends legitimate usage).

Examples:

• mdk4 → can jam/disrupt Wi-Fi networks in range
• hydra → password cracking / brute-force tool (often misused)
• others like aircrack-ng suite, Ettercap, etc.

Proposal:
Add an optional Disclaimer: block near the top of such pages (right after the short description, before examples), something like:

> Disclaimer: This tool can cause damage, disrupt networks, violate laws, or access systems without authorization if misused.

This is inspired by the recent hydra PR (#20858 by @SpikeTheDragon40k) which tries to address similar concerns.

Thoughts? Should this be encouraged/required for certain categories, or kept fully optional per-page?

[SpikeTheDragon40k]

I'm onboard with this!
In my opinion we should add this disclaimer that also the tool gives when you run it (eg: Hydra "Please do not use in military or secret service organizations, or for illegal purposes.")

[Managor]

We need to be careful about where to apply this to, as at least I don't want to start babying the user. I agree with the warnings when it's not immediately apparent that it can get you in trouble with the law like with wifi jamming. However I don't see a reason for adding it in tools like hydra because password cracking is equivalent to breaking and entering.

[SpikeTheDragon40k]

We need to be careful about where to apply this to, as at least I don't want to start babying the user. I agree with the warnings when it's not immediately apparent that it can get you in trouble with the law like with wifi jamming. However I don't see a reason for adding it in tools like hydra because password cracking is equivalent to breaking and entering.

Sorry @Managor but as i agree with you in the first part about babying the user i cannot agree on not put the warning on software that explicitly state that it can get you in trouble we can add it IMOH (obviusly).
Password Cracking = Breaking and Entering so "trouble"?

EDIT: I can also add that it's not our (TLDR) obligation to report and warn the user but it's a nice to have IMOH