Replace window.confirm with custom ConfirmDialog #259

google-labs-jules · 2026-01-23T02:02:19Z

Implemented a global ConfirmContext and ConfirmDialog component to replace native window.confirm alerts with a dual-theme accessible modal.

Key changes:

Created web/components/ui/ConfirmDialog.tsx wrapping Modal with "danger" and "info" variants.
Created web/contexts/ConfirmContext.tsx providing a Promise-based confirm() function.
Updated web/App.tsx to include ConfirmProvider.
Refactored web/pages/GroupDetails.tsx to use await confirm(...) for deleting expenses, groups, and members.
Improved web/components/ui/Modal.tsx accessibility by adding role="dialog" and aria-modal="true".
Verified changes with a temporary Playwright script ensuring the dialog appears and functions correctly in the app flow.

PR created automatically by Jules for task 3929385471900353896 started by @Devasy23

google-labs-jules · 2026-01-23T02:02:20Z

👋 Jules, reporting for duty! I'm here to lend a hand with this pull request.

When you start a review, I'll add a 👀 emoji to each comment to let you know I've read it. I'll focus on feedback directed at me and will do my best to stay out of conversations between you and other bots or reviewers to keep the noise down.

I'll push a commit with your requested changes shortly after. Please note there might be a delay between these steps, but rest assured I'm on the job!

For more direct control, you can switch me to Reactive Mode. When this mode is on, I will only act on comments where you specifically mention me with @jules. You can find this option in the Pull Request section of your global Jules UI settings. You can always switch back!

New to Jules? Learn more at jules.google/docs.

For security, I will only act on instructions from the user who triggered this task.

netlify · 2026-01-23T02:02:24Z

✅ Deploy Preview for split-but-wiser ready!

Name	Link
🔨 Latest commit	`a36350c`
🔍 Latest deploy log	https://app.netlify.com/projects/split-but-wiser/deploys/6972d6ada88d27000716b6cf
😎 Deploy Preview	https://deploy-preview-259--split-but-wiser.netlify.app
📱 Preview on mobile	Toggle QR Code... Use your smartphone camera to open QR code link.

To edit notification comments on pull requests, go to your Netlify project configuration.

coderabbitai · 2026-01-23T02:02:29Z

Important

Review skipped

Bot user detected.

To trigger a single review, invoke the @coderabbitai review command.

You can disable this status message by setting the reviews.review_status to false in the CodeRabbit configuration file.

_{Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.}

Devasy · 2026-01-24T05:26:25Z

@coderabbitai review this with pr #256, #258

coderabbitai · 2026-01-24T05:27:52Z

Tip

For best results, initiate chat on the files or code changes.

🧩 Analysis chain

@Devasy: I'll gather information about PR #256 to review it together with this PR #259.

🏁 Script executed:

#!/bin/bash
# Fetch details about PR `#256`
gh pr view 256 --json title,body,state,baseRefName,headRefName,additions,deletions,changedFiles,url

# Get the file changes in PR `#256`
gh pr diff 256

# Check if PR `#256` is merged or open
gh pr list --search "256" --json number,title,state,url

Length of output: 19879

🏁 Script executed:

#!/bin/bash
# Get the file changes in PR `#259` (current PR)
gh pr diff 259

# List all files changed in PR `#259`
gh pr view 259 --json files --jq '.files[].path'

Length of output: 13299

@Devasy: I've analyzed both PRs #256 and #259. These are duplicate PRs implementing the same feature - both replace window.confirm with a custom ConfirmDialog. Here's my comparison:

Key Differences

1. Variants Support

PR #256: Supports 3 variants (danger, warning, info) ✅
PR #259: Supports only 2 variants (danger, info)

2. Props Naming

PR #256: Uses description prop
PR #259: Uses message prop

3. Accessibility Implementation

PR #256: More comprehensive - adds role="dialog", aria-modal="true", aria-labelledby="modal-title" on outer div, plus aria-label="Close modal" on close button ✅
PR #259: Adds role="dialog" and aria-modal="true" on inner motion.div (less ideal placement)

4. Styling & UI

PR #256: More elaborate icon backgrounds with better theme integration ✅
PR #259: Simpler implementation

5. GroupDetails Usage

PR #256: Uses warning variant for "Leave Group" (more appropriate) ✅
PR #259: Uses danger variant for all actions

6. Documentation

PR #256: More comprehensive knowledge.md updates with implementation review section ✅
PR #259: Simpler documentation

7. Issues

PR #259: ❌ Includes test-results/.last-run.json (test artifact that should NOT be committed)
PR #256: Clean, no artifacts ✅

Recommendation

Proceed with PR #256 and close PR #259 because:

✅ More complete feature set (3 variants vs 2)
✅ Better accessibility implementation
✅ More appropriate variant usage (warning for non-destructive actions)
✅ Better styling and theming
✅ More comprehensive documentation
✅ No test artifacts committed
✅ Better ARIA attributes and screen reader support

Would you like me to help close PR #259 and proceed with reviewing PR #256 in detail?

coderabbitai · 2026-01-24T05:28:38Z

Tip

For best results, initiate chat on the files or code changes.

🧩 Analysis chain

@Devasy I'll review this PR in the context of PRs #256 and #258. Let me gather information about those PRs first.

🏁 Script executed:

#!/bin/bash

# Get details of PR `#256`
echo "=== PR `#256` Details ==="
gh pr view 256 --json title,body,state,headRefName,files

echo ""
echo "=== PR `#258` Details ==="
# Get details of PR `#258`
gh pr view 258 --json title,body,state,headRefName,files

echo ""
echo "=== Current PR `#259` Files ==="
# Get current PR files for comparison
gh pr view 259 --json files

Length of output: 3762

I can see that all three PRs are attempting to implement the same feature - replacing window.confirm with a custom ConfirmDialog system. Let me examine the actual implementation differences between them.

🏁 Script executed:

#!/bin/bash

# Check PR `#258` status more carefully
echo "=== PR `#258` Detailed Status ==="
gh pr view 258 --json number,state,mergeable,isDraft,commits

echo ""
echo "=== Compare file sizes in PR `#256` vs `#259` ==="
echo "PR `#256` - ConfirmDialog: 94 additions"
echo "PR `#259` - ConfirmDialog: 69 additions"
echo "Difference: 25 lines"
echo ""
echo "PR `#256` - ConfirmContext: 73 additions"
echo "PR `#259` - ConfirmContext: 58 additions"
echo "Difference: 15 lines"

echo ""
echo "=== Let's check the actual ConfirmDialog from current PR `#259` ==="
cat web/components/ui/ConfirmDialog.tsx

echo ""
echo "=== Let's check the ConfirmContext from current PR `#259` ==="
cat web/contexts/ConfirmContext.tsx

Length of output: 4913

🏁 Script executed:

#!/bin/bash

# Get the ConfirmDialog and ConfirmContext from PR `#256` to compare
echo "=== Fetching PR `#256` files ==="

# Check out PR `#256` branch temporarily to view files
git fetch origin jules-ux-confirm-dialog-12669270586709539879

echo ""
echo "=== PR `#256` ConfirmDialog.tsx ==="
git show origin/jules-ux-confirm-dialog-12669270586709539879:web/components/ui/ConfirmDialog.tsx

echo ""
echo "=== PR `#256` ConfirmContext.tsx ==="
git show origin/jules-ux-confirm-dialog-12669270586709539879:web/contexts/ConfirmContext.tsx

echo ""
echo "=== Compare GroupDetails changes ==="
echo "Current PR `#259` GroupDetails additions: 29"
echo "PR `#256` GroupDetails additions: 37"

Length of output: 503

🏁 Script executed:

#!/bin/bash

# Use gh api to get the file contents from PR `#256`
echo "=== PR `#256` ConfirmDialog.tsx ==="
gh api repos/Devasy/splitwiser/contents/web/components/ui/ConfirmDialog.tsx?ref=jules-ux-confirm-dialog-12669270586709539879 --jq '.content' | base64 -d

echo ""
echo "=== PR `#256` ConfirmContext.tsx ==="
gh api repos/Devasy/splitwiser/contents/web/contexts/ConfirmContext.tsx?ref=jules-ux-confirm-dialog-12669270586709539879 --jq '.content' | base64 -d

echo ""
echo "=== Check PR `#258` branch files ==="
gh api repos/Devasy/splitwiser/git/trees/621d6d39d678a2339c18aef6c724a243af9e5824?recursive=1 --jq '.tree[] | select(.path | startswith("web/")) | .path'

Length of output: 5867

@Devasy Thank you for requesting a comparative review. I've analyzed all three PRs and their implementations. Here's what I found:

Summary

All three PRs aim to replace window.confirm with a custom ConfirmDialog component, but they have significant differences:

PR #258: Appears incomplete or broken (no file changes detected)
PR #256: Most comprehensive implementation (94 lines ConfirmDialog, 73 lines Context)
PR #259 (current): Simpler implementation (69 lines ConfirmDialog, 58 lines Context)

Key Differences: PR `#256` vs PR `#259`

1. Variants Support

PR #256: 3 variants ('danger', 'warning', 'info') with exported TypeScript type
PR #259: 2 variants ('danger', 'info') only

2. Code Organization & Quality

PR #256 uses helper functions for cleaner code:

const getIcon = () => { /* ... */ }
const getIconBg = () => { /* ... */ }
const getButtonVariant = () => { /* ... */ }

PR #259 uses inline conditional styling:

<div className={`p-3 rounded-full flex-shrink-0 ${
    variant === 'danger'
    ? (style === THEMES.NEOBRUTALISM ? 'bg-red-200 border-2 border-black text-black' : 'bg-red-500/20 text-red-500')
    : (style === THEMES.NEOBRUTALISM ? 'bg-blue-200 border-2 border-black text-black' : 'bg-blue-500/20 text-blue-500')
}`}>

3. Props Naming

PR #256: Uses description prop (more semantic for dialog content)
PR #259: Uses message prop

4. Performance Optimization

PR #256 uses useCallback hooks which memoize callback functions to optimize performance:

const handleConfirm = useCallback(() => {
  setIsOpen(false);
  if (resolveRef) {
    resolveRef(true);
    setResolveRef(null); // Proper cleanup
  }
}, [resolveRef]);

PR #259 doesn't use useCallback (minor difference for this use case)

5. Responsive Design

PR #256: Better mobile/desktop layout with flex-col items-center text-center sm:flex-row sm:text-left
PR #259: Simpler flex layout without responsive breakpoints

6. Memory Management

PR #256: Properly cleans up by setting setResolveRef(null)
PR #259: Doesn't clean up the resolve reference

7. TypeScript

PR #256: Exports ConfirmVariant type for better type safety across the codebase
PR #259: Variant type is inline only

Recommendations

Option 1: Merge PR `#256` (Recommended)

Pros:

More complete feature set (warning variant for less critical confirmations)
Better code maintainability with helper functions
Superior responsive design
Proper memory cleanup
Better TypeScript support

Cons:

Slightly more code (but well-organized)

Option 2: Enhance PR `#259`

If you prefer the simpler approach of PR #259, consider adding:

The 'warning' variant for completeness
useCallback for handlers (though there's no significant harm without it, and some teams choose not to think about individual cases)
Proper cleanup of resolveRef
Responsive styling

Action for PR `#258`

Close PR #258 - it appears to be incomplete or corrupted with no actual file changes.

Technical Note

The useCallback hook optimizes performance by preventing unnecessary re-renders through memoizing callback functions, ensuring they are only recreated when dependencies change. However, it should only be relied on as a performance optimization, and if code doesn't work without it, the underlying problem should be fixed first.

My recommendation: Close PR #258 and #259, then merge PR #256 as it represents the most polished and complete implementation with better maintainability and user experience.

Would you like me to provide a detailed migration plan if you want to consolidate features from multiple PRs?

coderabbitai · 2026-01-24T05:29:02Z

Tip

For best results, initiate chat on the files or code changes.

🧩 Analysis chain

@Devasy I'll review PR #259 in the context of PRs #256 and #258. Let me gather information about those related pull requests first.

🏁 Script executed:

#!/bin/bash
# Get details of PR `#256`
echo "=== PR `#256` Details ==="
gh pr view 256 --json title,state,body,headRefName,baseRefName,files

echo -e "\n=== PR `#258` Details ==="
# Get details of PR `#258`
gh pr view 258 --json title,state,body,headRefName,baseRefName,files

echo -e "\n=== PR `#259` Files (current) ==="
# Get files changed in current PR `#259`
gh pr view 259 --json files

Length of output: 3806

Let me examine the actual implementation differences between these PRs:

🏁 Script executed:

#!/bin/bash
# Check out and compare the key files from different PRs

echo "=== Comparing ConfirmDialog.tsx implementations ==="

# Get PR `#256` branch content
git fetch origin jules-ux-confirm-dialog-12669270586709539879
echo "--- PR `#256` ConfirmDialog.tsx (lines and variant support) ---"
git show origin/jules-ux-confirm-dialog-12669270586709539879:web/components/ui/ConfirmDialog.tsx | head -50

echo -e "\n--- PR `#259` ConfirmDialog.tsx (lines and variant support) ---"
git show origin/jules/replace-window.confirm-with-custom-confirmdialog-3929385471900353896:web/components/ui/ConfirmDialog.tsx | head -50

echo -e "\n=== Line count comparison ==="
echo "PR `#256` ConfirmDialog.tsx:"
git show origin/jules-ux-confirm-dialog-12669270586709539879:web/components/ui/ConfirmDialog.tsx | wc -l

echo "PR `#259` ConfirmDialog.tsx:"
git show origin/jules/replace-window.confirm-with-custom-confirmdialog-3929385471900353896:web/components/ui/ConfirmDialog.tsx | wc -l

echo -e "\n=== Checking variant types ==="
echo "PR `#256` variants:"
git show origin/jules-ux-confirm-dialog-12669270586709539879:web/components/ui/ConfirmDialog.tsx | grep -E "type.*variant|'danger'|'warning'|'info'" | head -10

echo "PR `#259` variants:"
git show origin/jules/replace-window.confirm-with-custom-confirmdialog-3929385471900353896:web/components/ui/ConfirmDialog.tsx | grep -E "type.*variant|'danger'|'warning'|'info'" | head -10

Length of output: 1037

🏁 Script executed:

#!/bin/bash
# Use GitHub API to get file contents from different PRs

echo "=== Getting ConfirmDialog.tsx from PR `#256` ==="
gh api repos/Devasy/splitwiser/pulls/256/files --jq '.[] | select(.filename == "web/components/ui/ConfirmDialog.tsx") | .patch' | head -60

echo -e "\n=== Getting ConfirmDialog.tsx from PR `#259` ==="
gh api repos/Devasy/splitwiser/pulls/259/files --jq '.[] | select(.filename == "web/components/ui/ConfirmDialog.tsx") | .patch' | head -60

echo -e "\n=== Getting ConfirmContext.tsx from PR `#256` ==="
gh api repos/Devasy/splitwiser/pulls/256/files --jq '.[] | select(.filename == "web/contexts/ConfirmContext.tsx") | .patch' | head -40

echo -e "\n=== Getting ConfirmContext.tsx from PR `#259` ==="
gh api repos/Devasy/splitwiser/pulls/259/files --jq '.[] | select(.filename == "web/contexts/ConfirmContext.tsx") | .patch' | head -40

Length of output: 6620

@Devasy I've analyzed all three PRs and found they are duplicate implementations of the same feature. Here's the comparison:

PR Comparison

Feature	PR `#256`	PR `#258`	PR `#259` (Current)
Status	OPEN	OPEN	OPEN
Variants	✅ 3 variants (danger, warning, info)	❓ Unknown (no files)	⚠️ 2 variants (danger, info)
Prop Name	`description`	❓ Unknown	`message`
ConfirmDialog Lines	94 lines	❓ Unknown	69 lines
ConfirmContext Lines	73 lines	❓ Unknown	58 lines
Implementation	More comprehensive	Incomplete/Empty	Simpler

Key Differences

PR #256 advantages:

✅ Includes warning variant (missing in #259)
✅ More detailed styling logic for each variant
✅ More comprehensive implementation
✅ Uses semantic description prop name

PR #259 characteristics:

Simpler implementation
Missing warning variant
Uses message prop instead of description
Functionally similar but less feature-complete

PR #258:

❌ Has no files listed - appears incomplete or failed to create properly

Recommendation

Close PR #258 and #259, keep and review PR #256 because:

Avoids confusion: Three PRs solving the same problem creates review overhead
Better feature set: PR #256 includes the warning variant for future use cases
More polished: More comprehensive styling and variant handling
Consistency: The description prop name aligns better with dialog terminology

Would you like me to review PR #256 instead, or do you have a specific reason for preferring PR #259's simpler implementation?

[jules] ux: Replace window.confirm with custom ConfirmDialog

a36350c

Devasy marked this pull request as ready for review January 23, 2026 16:21

Devasy requested a review from vrajpatelll as a code owner January 23, 2026 16:21

Provide feedback

Saved searches

Use saved searches to filter your results more quickly

Replace window.confirm with custom ConfirmDialog #259

Replace window.confirm with custom ConfirmDialog #259

Uh oh!

google-labs-jules bot commented Jan 23, 2026

Uh oh!

google-labs-jules bot commented Jan 23, 2026

Uh oh!

netlify bot commented Jan 23, 2026 •

edited

Loading

Uh oh!

coderabbitai bot commented Jan 23, 2026

Review skipped

Uh oh!

Devasy commented Jan 24, 2026 •

edited

Loading

Uh oh!

coderabbitai bot commented Jan 24, 2026

Uh oh!

coderabbitai bot commented Jan 24, 2026

Uh oh!

coderabbitai bot commented Jan 24, 2026

Uh oh!

Reviewers

Assignees

Labels

Projects

Milestone

Development

Uh oh!

2 participants

Replace window.confirm with custom ConfirmDialog #259

Are you sure you want to change the base?

Replace window.confirm with custom ConfirmDialog #259

Uh oh!

Conversation

google-labs-jules bot commented Jan 23, 2026

Uh oh!

google-labs-jules bot commented Jan 23, 2026

Uh oh!

netlify bot commented Jan 23, 2026 • edited Loading Uh oh! There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Uh oh!

✅ Deploy Preview for split-but-wiser ready!

Uh oh!

coderabbitai bot commented Jan 23, 2026

Review skipped

Uh oh!

Devasy commented Jan 24, 2026 • edited Loading Uh oh! There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

coderabbitai bot commented Jan 24, 2026

Key Differences

1. Variants Support

2. Props Naming

3. Accessibility Implementation

4. Styling & UI

5. GroupDetails Usage

6. Documentation

7. Issues

Recommendation

Uh oh!

coderabbitai bot commented Jan 24, 2026

Summary

Key Differences: PR #256 vs PR #259

1. Variants Support

2. Code Organization & Quality

3. Props Naming

4. Performance Optimization

5. Responsive Design

6. Memory Management

7. TypeScript

Recommendations

Option 1: Merge PR #256 (Recommended)

Option 2: Enhance PR #259

Action for PR #258

Technical Note

Uh oh!

coderabbitai bot commented Jan 24, 2026

PR Comparison

Key Differences

Recommendation

Uh oh!

Reviewers

Assignees

Labels

Projects

Milestone

Development

Uh oh!

2 participants

netlify bot commented Jan 23, 2026 •

edited

Loading

Devasy commented Jan 24, 2026 •

edited

Loading

Key Differences: PR `#256` vs PR `#259`

Option 1: Merge PR `#256` (Recommended)

Option 2: Enhance PR `#259`

Action for PR `#258`