Skip to content

Conversation

@andreanadr
Copy link

@andreanadr andreanadr commented Jan 23, 2026

  • https://github.com/andreanadr/python-peps/issues/2337#issuecomment-104248301 SC/PEP Delegate has formally accepted/rejected the PEP and posted to the Discussions-To thread
  • Pull request title in appropriate format (PEP 123: Mark as Accepted)
  • Status changed to Accepted/Rejected
  • Resolution field points directly to SC/PEP Delegate official acceptance/rejected post, including the date (e.g. `01-Jan-2000 <https://discuss.python.org/12345/100>`__)
  • Acceptance/rejection notice added, if the SC/PEP delegate had major conditions or comments
  • Discussions-To, Post-History and Python-Version up to date

📚 Documentation preview 📚: https://pep-previews--4792.org.readthedocs.build/

@andreanadr andreanadr requested a review from a team as a code owner January 23, 2026 22:20
@python-cla-bot
Copy link

The following commit authors need to sign the Contributor License Agreement:

CLA not signed

@hugovk
Copy link
Member

hugovk commented Jan 23, 2026

@andreanadr Please don't make spam PRs.

@hugovk hugovk closed this Jan 23, 2026
@hugovk hugovk added the invalid Invalid issue or PR label Jan 23, 2026
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

invalid Invalid issue or PR

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants